Learning new vocabulary must be part of beginning any new discipline.\u00a0 It enables a way of speaking to colleagues with precision about ideas and concepts.\u00a0 In my Introduction to Research course from Royal Roads University I’m finding terms that at first glance seem familiar, but then discover that by adding an “ism” or “ology” suffix or by combining it with another familiar word, it has become the label for a whole new *world of meaning, only peripherally related to my previous understanding of the common meaning of that word.<\/p>\n
“Pragmatism” still means doing whatever works but as a research position, the scope of “whatever” is limited to the choice of research methods (Johnson & Christensen, 2014).\u00a0 Place “research” behind the noun “action” and suddenly you are talking about self-determination, empowerment, and participation in system change (Bentz & Shapiro, 1998), very little of which the uninitiated could extrapolate from the words “action research”.<\/p>\n
Another such term is “phenomenology”.\u00a0 The dictionary’s simple definition of phenomenon fits my common understanding of the word I use for UFO sightings or religious ecstasies.\u00a0 The popular definition however, is inadequate for understanding the research philosophy of phenomenology. The dictionary also lists a “Full Definition of PHENOMENON:”\u00a0which gets closer to the heart of phenomenology, “an object or aspect known through the senses rather than by thought or intuition<\/span>” (retrieved July 13, 2016 from http:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/phenomenon<\/a>) .<\/p>\n I usually prefer logical explanation over feeling, (feel free to apply a gender-stereotype label) but phenomenology with its emphasis on experiencing first hand instead of accepting society’s normal categorization of a phenomenon (Bentz & Shapiro, 1998) seemed so far out there I was drawn into trying to understand it.\u00a0 In a future blog post I will enlist the concept of racism to scratch more deeply into the surface of this unusual philosophy of research.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n *In a non-academic moment I speculate that the masses where language evolved apparently had no need to speak of such esoteric matters.\u00a0 When academics began pushing the boundaries of thought, having no ready vocabulary to express themselves, they appropriated common words and repurposed them.\u00a0 In some sense they were the early adopters of the web.2.0 mantra, “reuse, remix, and redistribute”.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Learning new vocabulary must be part of beginning any new discipline.\u00a0 It enables a way of speaking to colleagues with precision about ideas and concepts.\u00a0 In my Introduction to Research course from Royal Roads University I’m finding terms that at … Continue reading Bentz, V. M., & Shapiro, J. J. (1998). Mindful Inquiry in Social Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications, Inc.<\/h5>\n
Definition of PHENOMENON. (n.d.). Retrieved July 14, 2016, from http:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/phenomenon<\/h5>\n
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches<\/em> (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.<\/h5>\n